On Tue, Jul 7, 2015, 12:17 Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com> wrote: On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: > On 07/07/2015 08:15 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote: >> This will make harder to notice (and fix!) other regressions. > > I don't understand what you are trying to say. If a bug is worth fixing, > it's worth having a test so we don't have to fix it again in the future. I believe Serhiy's point is that there's no need to commit the test before the fix, so that the buildbots won't be unnecessarily red until the fix is committed. The fix should, of course, include a test. The test could be marked as an expected failure in the interim somitnisnt forgotten. -Brett -- Zach _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150707/70870ff0/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4