Erik Bray <erik.m.bray at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: >> On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 14:22:46 +1000 >> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> The main change from the last version discussed on python-ideas >> >> Was it discussed there? That list has become totally useless, I've >> stopped following it. > Considering that a useful discussion of a useful PEP occurred there > (not to mention other occasionally useful discussions) I'd say that > such a value judgment is not only unnecessary but also inaccurate. > That's fine if it's uninteresting to you and you don't want to follow > it, but let's please avoid judgments on entire mailing lists and, by > extension, the people holding conversations there. In an informal setting, exaggeration is used widely in continental Europe. I found the remark funny and was glad to hear that I'm not the only one who has problems with python-ideas. Stefan Krah -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150707/67ef8b19/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4