A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-July/140676.html below:

[Python-Dev] cpython: Tighten-up code in the set iterator to use an entry pointer rather than

[Python-Dev] cpython: Tighten-up code in the set iterator to use an entry pointer rather than [Python-Dev] cpython: Tighten-up code in the set iterator to use an entry pointer rather thanMaciej Fijalkowski fijall at gmail.com
Tue Jul 7 14:32:06 CEST 2015
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> FYI, do we have any indication that Raymond even read the comment? IIRC he
> doesn't regularly read python-dev. I also don't think code review comments
> ought to go to python-dev; the commiters list would seem more appropriate?
> (Though it looks like python-checkins is configured to direct replies to
> python-dev. Maybe we need to revisit that?)

I kind of thought that python does pre-commit reviews (at least seems
to apply to most people), so in case someone is completely exempt from
that, maybe he should read python-dev or wherever the reply is set to?
That also does not explain why a crashing commit has not been
reverted.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4