On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 14:22:46 +1000 > Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The main change from the last version discussed on python-ideas > > Was it discussed there? That list has become totally useless, I've > stopped following it. Considering that a useful discussion of a useful PEP occurred there (not to mention other occasionally useful discussions) I'd say that such a value judgment is not only unnecessary but also inaccurate. That's fine if it's uninteresting to you and you don't want to follow it, but let's please avoid judgments on entire mailing lists and, by extension, the people holding conversations there. Thanks, Erik
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4