On 9 January 2015 at 14:20, Davin Potts <python at discontinuity.net> wrote: > Thanks! That sounds like a nice, clear path forward. > > Regarding the doc issues being a bit more problematic to work through, I thoroughly understand. In the case of changes to the multiprocessing docs, accepting larger restructures would mainly be the domain of Richard Oudkerk (sbt) as the lead maintainer for the module. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4