On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Dmitry Kazakov <jsbfox at gmail.com> wrote: > Greetings. > > I'm sorry if I'm too insistent, but it's not truly rewarding to > constantly improve a patch that no one appears to need. Again, I > understand people are busy working and/or reviewing critical patches, > but 2 months of inactivity is not right. Yes, I posted a message > yesterday, but no one seemed to be bothered. In any case, I'll respect > your decision about this patch and will never ask for a review of this > patch again. The later patches seem to miss the Mercurial header that would allow the integrated review functionality on bugs.python.org to kick in (I presume) and thus make it much easier to review.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4