RetroSearch Browse

Tue Feb 24 18:46:27 CET 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-February/138502.html

I can do it but I don't want to be reviewing and accepting a PEP that's
still under discussion, and I don't have the bandwidth to follow the
discussion here -- I can only read the PEP. I will start that now.

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 24 February 2015 at 06:32, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 23 February 2015 at 19:47, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> >> So is the PEP ready for pronouncement or should there be more
> discussion?
> >
> > I think Brett's idea is worth incorporating, so let's thrash that out
> first.
> >
> >> Also, do you have a BDFL-delegate or do you want me to review it?
> >
> > No-one has stepped up as BDFL-delegate, and there's no obvious
> > candidate, so I think you're it, sorry :-)
>
> If Guido isn't keen, I'd be willing to cover it as the current runpy
> module maintainer and the one that updated this part of the
> interpreter startup sequence to handle the switch to importlib in 3.3.
>
> The PEP itself doesn't actually touch any of that internal machinery
> though, it just makes the capability a bit more discoverable and
> user-friendly.
>
> Regards,
> Nick.
>
> --
> Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
>

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150224/191bb337/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-February/138502.html below:

[Python-Dev] Request for Pronouncement: PEP 441