RetroSearch Browse

Mon Feb 23 19:16:47 CET 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-February/138445.html

Overall I like this and don't see any reason not to accept it, so +1. I do
have a couple comments/questions on the module API, though.

On Mon Feb 23 2015 at 12:45:28 PM Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:

> <SNIP>

> ``set_interpreter(archive, new_archive, interpreter=None)``
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Modifies the *archive*'s shebang line to contain the specified
> interpreter, and writes the updated archive to *new_archive*.  If the
> *interpreter* is ``None``, removes the shebang line.
>

Should new_archive default to None to allow for in-place editing?

-Brett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150223/d65c58e8/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-February/138445.html below:

[Python-Dev] Request for Pronouncement: PEP 441