On 21/02/2015 15:57, R. David Murray wrote: > On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 00:26:23 +1000, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 21 February 2015 at 00:05, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: >>> I agree that type names don't need to be quoted. >> As a user, I actually appreciate the quotes, because they make the >> error pattern easier for me to parse. Compare: >> >> int expected, but found str >> float expected, but found int >> >> 'int' expected, but found 'str' >> 'float' expected, but found 'int' > It's not a big deal to me either way, but I find the version with the > quotes makes me think it is looking for the literal string 'int', but > found the literal string 'str', whereas in the first case it seems > clear it is looking for objects of that type. Perhaps this is just > because I am used to the existing messages, but I think it goes > beyond that. > > +1. FWIW, I feel the same as David (and Antoine). Rob Cliffe
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4