On 20.02.15 18:11, Eric V. Smith wrote: > I asked about this years ago, and was told it was in case the type name > pointer was bad, and to limit the amount of garbage printed. Whether > that's an actual problem or not, I can't say. It seems more likely that > you'd get a segfault, but maybe if it was pointing to reused memory it > could be useful. Thank you. This makes sense and explains why type names are not truncated in Python code.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4