On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:32:07 -0500 Ben Hoyt <benhoyt at gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 we need to provide the inode (we shouldn't be throwing anything from the > > underlying directory entry away when possible). But... > > > > I think the "or None" semantics are a bad idea. It'd be better for this to > > raise AttributeError on Windows so that someone can't write the most natural > > form of code assuming that inode is valid and have it appear to work on > > Windows when in fact it'd do the wrong thing. > > +1 for inode support. I agree with the above -- it should either raise > AttributeError on Windows if it's not going to be set ... or it should > be more like Victor's original proposal where .inode() is a method > that calls stat on Windows. I don't have strong feelings. The whole point of scandir is to expose low-level system calls in a cross-platform way. If you start raising some exceptions on some platforms then that quality disappears. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4