Isaac Schwabacher wrote: > IIUC, the argument is that the Liskov Substitution Principle is a statement > about how objects of a subtype behave relative to objects of a supertype, and > it doesn't apply to constructors because they aren't behaviors of existing > objects. Another way to say that is that constructors are class methods, not instance methods. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4