On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote: > Now I see 3 choices: > > - take the full C implementation, because it's much faster (at least > 3.4x faster!) > - reject the whole PEP 471 (not nice), because it adds too much code > for a minor speedup (not true on Windows: up to 44x faster!) > - take the C+Python implementation, because maintenance matters more > than performances (only 1.3x faster, sorry) > > => IMO the best option is to take the C implementation. What do you think? > +1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150213/a523af3c/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4