A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-February/138242.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 471 (scandir): Poll to choose the implementation (full C or C+Python)

[Python-Dev] PEP 471 (scandir): Poll to choose the implementation (full C or C+Python) [Python-Dev] PEP 471 (scandir): Poll to choose the implementation (full C or C+Python)Alexander Belopolsky alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com
Fri Feb 13 20:28:15 CET 2015
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Now I see 3 choices:
>
> - take the full C implementation, because it's much faster (at least
> 3.4x faster!)
> - reject the whole PEP 471 (not nice), because it adds too much code
> for a minor speedup (not true on Windows: up to 44x faster!)
> - take the C+Python implementation, because maintenance matters more
> than performances (only 1.3x faster, sorry)
>
> => IMO the best option is to take the C implementation. What do you think?
>

+1
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150213/a523af3c/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4