> TL;DR: on POSIX, is it useful to know the inode number (st_ino) > without the device number (st_dev)? I can't answer this question (not being a Linux dev and not knowing much about this), but I'm +1 for adding DirEntry.inode(). On Windows, we're exposing all the information FindFirst/FindNext give us, but on Linux we expose everything useful from readdir except d_ino, which is easy to add, and according to that reddit comment, may make scandir useful in more real scenarios. -Ben
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4