RetroSearch Browse

Fri Feb 13 13:20:27 CET 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-February/138218.html

On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:27:04 +0200
Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 13.02.15 12:07, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > * C implementation: scandir is at least 3.5x faster than listdir, up
> > to 44.6x faster on Windows
> 
> Results on Windows was obtained in the becnhmark that doesn't drop disk 
> caches and runs listdir before scandir.

Well, that's the point. The objective here is to speed up Python, not
the hard drive.

Regards

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-February/138218.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 471 (scandir): Poll to choose the implementation (full C or C+Python)