A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-February/138209.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 471 (scandir): Poll to choose the implementation (full C or C+Python)

[Python-Dev] PEP 471 (scandir): Poll to choose the implementation (full C or C+Python) [Python-Dev] PEP 471 (scandir): Poll to choose the implementation (full C or C+Python)Paul Moore p.f.moore at gmail.com
Fri Feb 13 11:19:00 CET 2015
On 13 February 2015 at 10:07, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote:
> => IMO the best option is to take the C implementation. What do you think?

FWIW (as I'm not a core dev) I agree. The Windows speedup is huge, and
well worth adding the code. I'm assuming that the majority of the C
code is cross-platform, so we're not adding a big chunk of code
needing *both* Windows and C skills to maintain (any dev with C skills
could handle it).

Paul
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4