Georg Brandl wrote:
> The call syntax part is a mixed bag: on the one hand it is nice to be
> consistent with the extended possibilities in literals (flattening),
> but on the other hand there would be small but annoying inconsistencies
> anyways (e.g. the duplicate kwarg case above).
That inconsistency already exists -- duplicate keys are
allowed in dict literals but not calls:
>>> {'a':1, 'a':2}
{'a': 2}
--
Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4