A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-February/138090.html below:

[Python-Dev] (no subject) PEP 448

[Python-Dev] (no subject) PEP 448 [Python-Dev] (no subject) PEP 448Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Tue Feb 10 00:51:39 CET 2015
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015 16:06:20 -0500
Neil Girdhar <mistersheik at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> The updated PEP 448 (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0448/) is
> implemented now based on some early work by Thomas Wouters (in 2008) and
> Florian Hahn (2013) and recently completed by Joshua Landau and me.

To be clear, the PEP will probably be useful for one single line of
Python code every 10000. This is a very weak case for such an intrusive
syntax addition. I would support the PEP if it only added the simple
cases of tuple unpacking, left alone function call conventions, and
didn't introduce **-unpacking.

Barring that, I really don't want to review the patch and I'm a rather
decided -1 on the current PEP.

Regards

Antoine.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4