A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-February/138085.html below:

[Python-Dev] (no subject)

[Python-Dev] (no subject)Neil Girdhar mistersheik at gmail.com
Mon Feb 9 23:12:02 CET 2015
Right,

Just to be clear though:  **-args must follow any *-args and position
arguments.  So at worst, your example is:

f(x, y, *k, *b, c,  **w, **d)

Best,

Neil

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org>
wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015, at 16:32, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > FWIW, I've encouraged Neil and others to complete this code as a
> > prerequisite for a code review (but I can't review it myself). I am
> > mildly
> > in favor of the PEP -- if the code works and looks maintainable I would
> > accept it. (A few things got changed in the PEP as a result of the work.)
>
> In a way, it's a simplification, since functions are now simply called
> with a sequence of "generalized arguments"; there's no privileged kwarg
> or vararg. Of course, I wonder how much of f(**w, x, y, *k, *b, **d, c)
> we would see...
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150209/d239b060/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4