FWIW, I've encouraged Neil and others to complete this code as a prerequisite for a code review (but I can't review it myself). I am mildly in favor of the PEP -- if the code works and looks maintainable I would accept it. (A few things got changed in the PEP as a result of the work.) On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015, at 16:06, Neil Girdhar wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > The updated PEP 448 (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0448/) is > > implemented now based on some early work by Thomas Wouters (in 2008) and > > Florian Hahn (2013) and recently completed by Joshua Landau and me. > > > > The issue tracker http://bugs.python.org/issue2292 has a working > patch. > > Would someone be able to review it? > > The PEP is not even accepted. > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150209/01bbef71/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4