On 18.12.2015 22:09, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I guess we could make the default arg to sleep() 1e9. Or make it None
> and special-case it. I don't feel strongly about this -- I'm not sure
> how baffling it would be to accidentally leave out the delay and find
> your code sleeps forever rather than raising an error (since if you
> don't expect the infinite default you may not expect this kind of
> behavior). But I do feel it's not important enough to add a new
> function or method.
Why still guessing the best surrogate for infinity?
Seems like python is just missing int('inf'). :/
Best,
Sven
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4