On 19 December 2015 at 03:44, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Tim Legrand <timlegrand.perso at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Well, this looks like a rhetorical question :) > > It wasn't, I was hoping you'd be quicker at picking one than me (I don't > publish packages on PyPI much myself so the docs all look like Greek to me > :-). There's an effort currently underway to significantly improve the getting started tutorials on packaging.python.org, but it's unfortunately going to be a long time before we can retire the legacy docs completely - while parts of them have aged badly (and are entirely superseded by packaging.python.org), other parts unfortunately aren't covered anywhere else yet :( Even once the new docs are in place, getting them to the top of search of results ahead of archived material that may be years out of date is likely to still be a challenge - for example, even considering just the legacy distutils docs, the "3.1" and "2" docs appear in the results at https://www.google.com/search?q=registering+with+the+package+index+site%3Apython.org&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8, but the latest "3" docs don't. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4