RetroSearch Browse

Tue Dec 1 13:56:56 EST 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-December/142343.html

Hi David.

Any reason you run a tiny tiny subset of benchmarks?

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Stewart, David C
<david.c.stewart at intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Fabio Zadrozny <fabiofz at gmail.com<mailto:fabiofz at gmail.com>>
> Date: Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 1:36 AM
> To: David Stewart <david.c.stewart at intel.com<mailto:david.c.stewart at intel.com>>
> Cc: "R. David Murray" <rdmurray at bitdance.com<mailto:rdmurray at bitdance.com>>, "python-dev at python.org<mailto:python-dev at python.org>" <python-dev at python.org<mailto:python-dev at python.org>>
> Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Avoiding CPython performance regressions
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Stewart, David C <david.c.stewart at intel.com<mailto:david.c.stewart at intel.com>> wrote:
>
> On 11/30/15, 5:52 AM, "Python-Dev on behalf of R. David Murray" <python-dev-bounces+david.c.stewart=intel.com at python.org<mailto:intel.com at python.org> on behalf of rdmurray at bitdance.com<mailto:rdmurray at bitdance.com>> wrote:
>
>>
>>There's also an Intel project posted about here recently that checks
>>individual benchmarks for performance regressions and posts the results
>>to python-checkins.
>
> The description of the project is at https://01.org/lp - Python results are indeed sent daily to python-checkins. (No results for Nov 30 and Dec 1 due to Romania National Day holiday!)
>
> There is also a graphic dashboard at http://languagesperformance.intel.com/
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Interesting, but I'm curious on which benchmark set are you running? From the graphs it seems it has a really high standard deviation, so, I'm curious to know if that's really due to changes in the CPython codebase / issues in the benchmark set or in how the benchmarks are run... (it doesn't seem to be the benchmarks from https://hg.python.org/benchmarks/ right?).
>
> Fabio – my advice to you is to check out the daily emails sent to python-checkins. An example is https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-checkins/2015-November/140185.html. If you still have questions, Stefan can answer (he is copied).
>
> The graphs are really just a manager-level indicator of trends, which I find very useful (I have it running continuously on one of the monitors in my office) but core developers might want to see day-to-day the effect of their changes. (Particular if they thought one was going to improve performance. It's nice to see if you get community confirmation).
>
> We do run nightly a subset of https://hg.python.org/benchmarks/ and run the full set when we are evaluating our performance patches.
>
> Some of the "benchmarks" really do have a high standard deviation, which makes them hardly very useful for measuring incremental performance improvements, IMHO. I like to see it spelled out so I can tell whether I should be worried or not about a particular delta.
>
> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fijall%40gmail.com

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-December/142343.html below:

[Python-Dev] Avoiding CPython performance regressions