On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote: > 2015-12-01 10:49 GMT+01:00 Fabio Zadrozny <fabiofz at gmail.com>: > > As for the graph, it should be easy to customize (and I'm open to > > suggestions). In the case, as it is, red is slower and blue is faster > (so, > > for instance in > > https://www.speedtin.com/reports/1_CPython27x_Performance_Over_Time > > For me, -10% means "faster" in the context of a benchmark. On this > graph, I see -21% but it's slower in fact. I'm confused. > > Victor > Humm, I understand your point, although I think the main reason for the confusion is the lack of a real legend there... I.e.: the reason it's like that is because the idea is that it's a comparison among 2 versions, not absolute benchmark times, so negative means one version is 'slower/worse' than another and blue means it's 'faster/better' (as a reference, Eclipse also uses the same format for reporting it -- e.g.: http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops4/R-4.5-201506032000/performance/performance.php?fp_type=0 ) I've added a legend now, so, hopefully it clears up the confusion ;) -- Fabio -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20151201/554502be/attachment-0001.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4