RetroSearch Browse

Tue Dec 1 04:36:04 EST 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-December/142331.html

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Stewart, David C <david.c.stewart at intel.com
> wrote:

>
> On 11/30/15, 5:52 AM, "Python-Dev on behalf of R. David Murray"
> <python-dev-bounces+david.c.stewart=intel.com at python.org on behalf of
> rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >There's also an Intel project posted about here recently that checks
> >individual benchmarks for performance regressions and posts the results
> >to python-checkins.
>
> The description of the project is at https://01.org/lp - Python results
> are indeed sent daily to python-checkins. (No results for Nov 30 and Dec 1
> due to Romania National Day holiday!)
>
> There is also a graphic dashboard at
> http://languagesperformance.intel.com/

Hi Dave,

Interesting, but I'm curious on which benchmark set are you running? From
the graphs it seems it has a really high standard deviation, so, I'm
curious to know if that's really due to changes in the CPython codebase /
issues in the benchmark set or in how the benchmarks are run... (it doesn't
seem to be the benchmarks from https://hg.python.org/benchmarks/ right?).

--
Fabio

> 
>
> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fabiofz%40gmail.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20151201/b1795301/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-December/142331.html below:

[Python-Dev] Avoiding CPython performance regressions