RetroSearch Browse

Fri Aug 28 18:11:55 CEST 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-August/141394.html

On 2015-08-28 11:44 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>     Unfortunately, separating it from the standard library is something
>     that I don't think we can do so late in the 3.5 release candidates
>     process.
>
>
> Ultimately it's Larry's call, but I don't see why we couldn't. If we 
> were talking about something as low-level as the urllib package then I 
> would agree, but beyond its own tests is there anything in the stdlib 
> that depends on asyncio?

As Victor already replied, asyncio is pretty self contained, and
nothing in the stdlib depends on it.

If we really can remove it, let's consider it.

Yury

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-August/141394.html below:

[Python-Dev] provisional status for asyncio