Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-August/141376.html below:

[Python-Dev] provisional status for asyncio

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] provisional status for asyncio
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] provisional status for asyncio
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2015-08-27 6:44 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Maybe asyncio should just be kept provisional during 3.5, with a 
> separate promise to remain backward compatible?

I'm +1.

I'm also certain that by 3.6.0 we will stabilize asyncio to the point we 
can freeze it like any other stdlib module.

Yury

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] provisional status for asyncio
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] provisional status for asyncio
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4