On 8/18/15 7:52 AM, R. David Murray wrote: > On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 12:47:22 +1000, Ben Finney <ben+python at benfinney.id.au> wrote: >> Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> writes: >> >>> However - 9 isn't a bad number for 'patches that the triagers think >>> are ready to commit' inventory. >>> >>> So yay!. Also - triagers, thank you for feeding patches through the >>> process. Please keep it up :) >> If I were a cheerleader I would be able to lead a rousing “Yay, go team >> backlog burners!†> Which at this point in time I think pretty much means Robert, who I also > extend a hearty thanks to. (I think I moved one issue out of commit > review because the test didn't fail, and that's been it for me since > Robert started his burn down...) > > --David Thank you Robert, David, and Ben :D Is anyone game for setting another goal to tackle a targeted subset of patches in "patch review" and move them to "commit review"?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4