On 08/17/2015 03:02 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > On 17 August 2015 at 05:34, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote: >> 2015-08-16 7:21 GMT-07:00 Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com>: >>> 3. All of the complex examples look scary, but in practice I wouldn't >>> write stuff like that - why would anyone do so unless they were being >>> deliberately obscure? >> I'm quite sure that users will write complex code in f-strings. > So am I. Some people will always write bad code. I won't (or at least, > I'll try not to write code that *I* consider to be complex :-)) but > "you can use this construct to write bad code" isn't an argument for > dropping the feature. If you couldn't find *good* uses, that would be > different, but that doesn't seem to be the case here (at least in my > view). I think this corner of the debate is covered by the "Consenting adults" guiding principle we use 'round these parts. Cheers, //arry/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150817/05cde7ca/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4