I don't think it needs a PEP. See my response in the issue. On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote: > So, there's a patch on issue 9232 - allow trailing commas in function > definitions - but there's been enough debate that I suspect we need a > PEP. > > Would love it if someone could correct me, but I'd like to be able to > either categorically say 'no' and close the ticket, or 'yes and this > is what needs to happen next'. > > -Rob > > -- > Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hp.com> > Distinguished Technologist > HP Converged Cloud > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150811/223eedfc/attachment-0001.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4