On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:32:02 -0700 Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > > No, this is the name we've been using since PEP 342 and it's still the same > concept. The fact that all syntax uses the word "async" and not "coro" or "coroutine" hints that it should really *not* be called a coroutine (much less a "native coroutine", which both silly and a lie). Why not "async function"? Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4