Yury Selivanov wrote: > Everybody is pulling me in a different direction :) > Guido proposed to call them "native coroutines". Some people > think that "async functions" is a better name. Greg loves > his "cofunction" term. Not the term, the *idea*. But PEP 492 is not based on that idea, so I don't advocate calling anything in PEP 492 a cofunction. My vote goes to "async function". -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4