RetroSearch Browse

Tue Apr 28 00:48:49 CEST 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/139572.html

Hello,

On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 20:39:55 -0400
Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com> wrote:

[]

> > As for 3rd point, I'd like to remind that CPython is only one Python
> > implementation. And with my MicroPython hat on, I'd like to know if
> > (some of) these new features are "bloat" or "worthy" for the space
> > constraints we have.
> 
> OT: MicroPython is an amazing project. Kudos for doing it.
> 
> I really hope that addition of few new magic methods won't
> make it too hard for you guys to implement PEP 492 in
> MicroPython one day.

Thanks! Damien George, MicroPython's author, actually already made a
basic implementation of async def/await:
https://github.com/micropython/micropython/commit/81afa7e098634605c04597d34a51ca2e59a87d7c
So we surely do hope this PEP will be accepted, and soonish! ;-)

-- 
Best regards,
 Paul                          mailto:pmiscml at gmail.com

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/139572.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 492: No new syntax is required