RetroSearch Browse

Fri Apr 24 11:07:33 CEST 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/139493.html

Paul Moore wrote:
> On 24 April 2015 at 09:34, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> 
>>   cocall await(cocall f(x))
>>
>>That doesn't look so bad to me.
> 
> I've not been following this discussion (and coroutines make my head
> hurt) but this idiom looks like it's bound to result in people getting
> the idea that you scatter "cocall" throughout an expression until you
> get it to work.

They won't need to do that, because they'll get told
exactly where they've left one out, or put one in that
they shouldn't have.

Also, the places you need to put cocall are exactly
the same as the places you need yield-from currently,
or await under PEP 492.

-- 
Greg

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/139493.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 3152 and yield from Future()