On 24 April 2015 at 09:34, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > and after the refactoring it becomes > > cocall await(cocall f(x)) > > That doesn't look so bad to me. I've not been following this discussion (and coroutines make my head hurt) but this idiom looks like it's bound to result in people getting the idea that you scatter "cocall" throughout an expression until you get it to work. Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4