Andrew Svetlov wrote: > But we already have asyncio and code based on asyncio coroutines. > To make it work I should always use costart() in places where asyncio > requires coroutine. As I understand it, asyncio would require changes to make it work seamlessly with PEP 492 as well, since an object needs to have either a special flag or an __await__ method before it can have 'await' applied to it. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4