RetroSearch Browse

Thu Apr 23 20:12:19 CEST 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/139470.html

On Apr 23, 2015, at 02:02 PM, Yury Selivanov wrote:

>To my eye 'async def name()', 'async with', 'async for' look
>better than 'def async name()', 'with async' and 'for async'.
>But that's highly subjective.

Would you be willing to add this as an alternative to the PEP, under the "Why
async def" section probably?

As with all such bikesheds, Guido will pick the color and we'll ooh and
ahh. :)

Cheers,
-Barry

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/139470.html below:

[Python-Dev] async/await in Python; v2