On 04/22, PJ Eby wrote: > tl;dr: I like the overall ideas but hate the syntax and type > segregation involved: declaring a function async at the top is OK to > enable async with/for semantics and await expressions, but the rest > seems unnecessary and bad for writing robust code. (e.g. note that > requiring different syntax means a function must either duplicate code > or restrict its input types more, and type changes in remote parts of > the program will propagate syntax changes throughout.) Agreed. -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4