RetroSearch Browse

Wed Apr 22 18:36:23 CEST 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/139371.html

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Ian Cordasco <graffatcolmingov at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> On a separate thread Cory provided an example of what the hints would
>> look like for *part* of one function in the requests public functional API.
>>
>
> Thanks. That encouraged me to look around for recent posts from Cory.
> Wow...
>

You're welcome! And yeah. That union that Cory posted was for *one*
parameter if I remember correctly. I won't speak for Cory, but I'm not
against the type hints in 484 but they will be difficult for us as a
project. They'll be marginally less difficult for me in a different project
of mine.

I also wonder about importing type definitions from other packages. The
Requests-Toolbelt adds a few features that are enhanced versions of what's
already in Requests. I can think of a few type hints that we might create
to represent certain parameters, but I don't want to have to copy those for
the features in the Requests-Toolbelt. I would expect this to "Just Work",
but I wonder if anyone else has considered the possibility of this being a
need.

Cheers,
Ian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150422/08198f01/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/139371.html below:

[Python-Dev] typeshed for 3rd party packages