A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/139361.html below:

[Python-Dev] Type hints -- a mediocre programmer's reaction

[Python-Dev] Type hints -- a mediocre programmer's reaction [Python-Dev] Type hints -- a mediocre programmer's reactionCory Benfield cory at lukasa.co.uk
Wed Apr 22 13:13:55 CEST 2015
On 21 April 2015 at 18:12, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote:
> I expect that dealing with duck typing will be very high on the list
> of priorities for the future. In the meantime, for this specific use-case,
> you're probably not going to be able to statically check this type hint.
> Your choices would be:
>
> - don't type check anything;

To be clear, for the moment this is what requests will do, unless the
other maintainers strongly disagree with me (they don't). I am quite
convinced that PEP 484 is insufficiently powerful to make it
worthwhile for requests to provide 'official' type hints.

I suspect someone will provide hints to typeshed, and I certainly hope
they're good, because if they're bad we'll definitely field bug
reports about them (more on this in a different thread I think).
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4