On 04/21/2015 04:50 AM, Tal Einat wrote: > As for the default set of accepted types for various convertors, if we > could choose any syntax we liked, something like "accept=+{NoneType}" > would be much better IMO. In theory Argument Clinic could use any syntax it likes. In practice, under the covers we tease out one or two bits of non-Python syntax, then run ast.parse over it. Saved us a lot of work. "s: accept={str,NoneType}" is a legal Python parameter declaration; "s: accept+={NoneType}" is not. If I could figure out a clean way to hack in support for += I'll support it. Otherwise you'll be forced to spell it out. //arry/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150421/cc83a7a9/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4