Hello, On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 08:05:59 -0700 Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus at rath.org> wrote: > On Apr 20 2015, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote: > > Maybe it'd be of value to have a quick "code stripper" that takes > > away all the annotations, plus any other junk/framing that you're > > not interested in, and gives you something you can browse in a text > > editor? > > If you need to preprocess your source code to make it suitable for > human consumption something is very wrong with your language design. > I can't believe you're seriously suggesting this. I'm sure that was irony, d'oh. Just as my suggestion to have stickers "This system runs free of type annotations" for the most zealous anti-annotations folks. The proposed type annotations are very readable. Not as readable as C's type syntax, but ok. Sorry, irony again. I remember myself as a 10-years old kid, trying to wrap my head about C's types syntax, and not getting anything of it. So, please contrast it to C - PEP484 gives very readable syntax, and even both human- and machine-readable. If you feel like writing 3-story type annotation, just resist the temptation, "Any" is your best friend. -- Best regards, Paul mailto:pmiscml at gmail.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4