RetroSearch Browse

Tue Apr 14 19:53:30 CEST 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/139126.html

At least asyncio uses keyword-only intensively.

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Eric V. Smith <eric at trueblade.com> wrote:
> I'm working on adding a numeric_owner parameter to some tarfile methods
> (http://bugs.python.org/issue23193),
>
> In a review, Berker suggested making the parameter keyword-only. I agree
> that you'd likely never want to pass just "True", but that
> "numeric_owner=True" would be a better usage.
>
> But, I don't see a lot of keyword-only parameters being added to stdlib
> code. Is there some position we've taken on this? Barring someone saying
> "stdlib APIs shouldn't contain keyword-only params", I'm inclined to
> make numeric_owner keyword-only.
>
> Is there anything stopping me from making it keyword-only?
>
> Thanks.
> Eric.
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/andrew.svetlov%40gmail.com

-- 
Thanks,
Andrew Svetlov

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/139126.html below:

[Python-Dev] Keyword-only parameters