Hello, Following up with PEP 448, I've gone over the entire code review except a few points as mentioned at the issue: http://bugs.python.org/review/2292/. I'm hoping that this will get done at the PyCon sprints. Is there any way I can help? I couldn't make it to PyCon, but I do live in Montreal. I would be more than happy to make time to meet up with anyone who wants to help with the review, e.g. Laika's usually a good place to work and have a coffee ( http://www.yelp.ca/biz/la%C3%AFka-montr%C3%A9al-2). Code reviews tend go much faster face-to-face. Also, I'm definitely interested in meeting any Python developers for coffee or drinks. I know the city pretty well. :) Best, Neil On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:11 PM Neil Girdhar <mistersheik at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I was wondering what is left with the PEP 448 ( >> http://bugs.python.org/issue2292) code review? Big thanks to Benjamin, >> Ethan, and Serhiy for reviewing some (all?) of the code. What is the next >> step of this process? >> > > My suspicion is that if no one steps up between now and PyCon to do a > complete code review of the final patch, we as a group will try to get it > done at the PyCon sprints. I have made the issue a release blocker to help > make sure it gets reviewed and doesn't accidentally get left behind. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150407/3abdf8a2/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4