Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/139046.html below:

[Python-Dev] [python-committers] Do we need to sign Windows files with GnuPG?

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [python-committers] Do we need to sign Windows files with GnuPG?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [python-committers] Do we need to sign Windows files with GnuPG?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> And I suspect python-dev generally doesn't put much weight on the 
> extra effort required (release managers have all been using gpg for
> decades, it's pretty trivial)

I'm aware of this, but still don't see it as a reason to unnecessarily duplicate process.

> or see any reason why Microsoft's internal GPL-hate should have any
> effect on the PSF's behaviour.

Seems the "internal GPL-hate" has softened even more than I was aware. The history for GPG was spotty, but my request was automatically approved, so I guess the line has been moved far enough away that I've lost that excuse :)

Now I just have to find the time to learn how to use it...

Cheers,
Steve

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [python-committers] Do we need to sign Windows files with GnuPG?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [python-committers] Do we need to sign Windows files with GnuPG?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4