RetroSearch Browse

Sat Apr 4 17:04:10 CEST 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/139028.html

Le samedi 4 avril 2015, Ludovic Gasc <gmludo at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> From a user's point of view, it should count for the total time, IMO.
>> If people want a timeout for each syscall, they should call send()
>> iteratively.
>
>
> I'm agree with Antoine for a global timeout.
>

 Ok, I also agree. I will modify sendall in Python 3.5 and suggest to loop
on send to keep the same behaviour on timeout.

I don't want to change python 3.4 or 2.7, it would be strange to have a
different behaviour in a minor python version.

Victor
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150404/ffc836eb/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/139028.html below:

reset timeout at each successful syscall?