On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:56:44 +0200 Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote: > > The problem is that the socket.sendall() method may require multiple > syscalls. In this case, does the timeout count for the total time or > only for a single syscall? Asked differently: should we reset the > timeout each time a syscall succeed? From a user's point of view, it should count for the total time, IMO. If people want a timeout for each syscall, they should call send() iteratively. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4