RetroSearch Browse

Fri Apr 3 12:47:58 CEST 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/138999.html

On 03.04.2015 11:56, Larry Hastings wrote:
> My Windows development days are firmly behind me.  So I don't really have an opinion here.  So I put
> it to you, Windows Python developers: do you care about GnuPG signatures on Windows-specific files? 
> Or do you not care?

Regardless of target platform, I firmly believe we should (continue to)
GPG sign all distribution files as well as provide hash files/values
for them.

This is very useful to detect corrupted downloads or files which
were not created by the original packagers.

-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
eGenix.com

Professional Python Services directly from the Source
>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ...        http://www.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ...             http://zope.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ...        http://python.egenix.com/
________________________________________________________________________

::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! ::::

   eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH  Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
    D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
           Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
               http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/138999.html below:

[Python-Dev] [python-committers] Do we need to sign Windows files with GnuPG?