On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 01:10:53 -0700 Hasan Diwan <hasan.diwan at gmail.com> wrote: > Matěj, > > On 26 September 2014 00:28, Matěj Cepl <mcepl at cepl.eu> wrote: > > > Where does your faith that other /bin/sh implementations (dash, > > busybox, etc.) are less buggy comes from? > > > The fact that they are simpler, in terms of lines of code. It's no > guarantee, but the less a given piece of code does, the less bugs it will > have. -- H And that they have less "features" (which is certainly correlated to their simplicity). IIUC, the misimplemented feature leading to this vulnerability is a bash-ism. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4