> On Sep 24, 2014, at 4:24 PM, Steve Dower <Steve.Dower at microsoft.com> wrote: > >> Paul Moore wrote: >> On 24 September 2014 14:16, Mike Miller <python-dev at mgmiller.net> wrote: >>> It has been a supported option for just shy of 15 years on 2.X... >>> most if not all the bugs (setuptools) were fixed a decade ago, and >>> right now thousands, if not millions of people are running it under >>> Program Files right now. I can vouch for several thousand because a >>> company I work for distributes Python and pip there for its customers >>> all around the world w/o issue. >> >> One thing that I presume would be an issue. Isn't Program Files protected in >> newer versions of Windows? I haven't tested this myself, so I may be wrong about >> this. So take the following with a pinch of salt. > > It's protected very well in newer versions. You typically need to be an administrator AND have opted in to being able to modify system files without warning. > >> Assuming so, that means that if Python is installed there, the standard "pip >> install XXX" would not work unless run in an elevated shell. We are currently >> trying to focus on a unified message for how users should install distributions >> from PyPI, by using pip install. >> I'm not sure it's a good idea to complicate that message yet by adding >> provisos about managing the system Python (which is the only one most Windows >> users will use). > > This is my main concern. Until pip install --user is the default (or the fallback if there are no write permissions on the destination), a default that locks users out of the simplest PyPI experience is a genuine problem. Yes, users can elevate to run pip, but I'd prefer pip to use elevation if it has it and to use per-user if not. > > There also isn't a great story for per-user Python installs on Windows, but that becomes fairly cheap with the installer rewrite. > >> I know this is only the same situation as Unix users have, but Windows users >> don't have a distro offering packaged versions of PyPI modules. >> I also know we should be moving towards promoting --user, but I don't think >> we're quite ready for that yet. And my speculation doesn't compete with your >> real-life experience, certainly. But I would suggest carefully checking before >> making the switch. > > A good reason to decide early on a change like this, or at least to promote it as an option in 3.5 and make it the default in 3.6. One thing about *nix is even though you can’t write to your normal Python install location without root, invoking pip with permissions (assuming you have them) is as easy as prefacing it with ``sudo`` in most cases. Does Windows have an equivalent or do you need to launch a whole new shell? --- Donald Stufft PGP: 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140924/364eabfe/attachment-0001.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4